SAC asks if Julien de Bellefeuille is representing the defendants - they weren't informed that he would be representing them

JdB is noted as a representative of the defendants.


Roxanne:
-Starts by saying that she won by a large margin, with the help of her volunteers....submitted all of her receipts
-Reversing the results of the elections is not an effective solution
-Maureen has no witnesses, which makes her think that her motivations are only political
-Her emails with Sydney were from before the campaign, and says that there is nothing wrong with helping others and giving them council before the campaign
-Appelants evidence is weak! bah!

Julie:
- Was only registered candidate for VP Comm this year
- Says that her probabilities of winning were very high, and so it doesn't make sense for her to have worked within a slate
- Evidence does not prove that Julie participated in a slate
- Understands and respects that every student has the right to appeal the results of an election

Jean Guillaume
- talks about people wanting change....
- "it is with honour and respect that he accepted the decision of the students in the elections"
- Actions called for
- Certain individuals who are "

Seamus
- "although politics can sometimes be dirty, i did my best to run a clean campaign"
- claims that throughout the campaign, none of the defendants were penalized
- calls their claims "at best false, and at worse, SLANDER!" omg!
- says that Cameron Montgomery and Alex Chaput's claims about his conversation in the UCU is ridiculous, since bloggers are EVERYWHERE! They would have blogged about it!
- OPIRG has a button maker that's open for use for everyone! My volunteers made my buttons at Iain's house with it! (....er....)

Ladies and gentlemen, this is your future president!