Question-time!
Amy: only in November? would that be ok, instead? in the spirit? s'ok, mr saurus?
PJ: nope! not enough, my dear.
Faris: include causalties of war as well?
PJ: quite!
Cheeve: two sets of ppl?
PJ: vets and causalties
Becky: I also have family members who are veterans. Are you just proving a point? Why are you deciding to honour veterans in this way?
PJ: I have a place at the BOA, so it is a platform available to me.
Amending the motion to only November?
Dick: we experience our freedom everyday. So, once a year isn t good enough.
Becky: very carefully trying to be against the motion without being offensive. something about volunteering in a nursing home or something.
Fancie: need to support veterans. let's move on.
Amendment vote: passes.
Seamus: amendment - add: 'in all wars' - wants to ensure that all involved in war are represented
Motion passes. but only in November. and 'respect[ing] the lives lost and the affected civilians of all wars.'
(Seamus is the remember-est! blogger's note: it is not about who has the biggest claim on the war, mr wolfe. this kind of condescension is really not appropriate in this debate.)
No comments:
Post a Comment