Sunday, March 1, 2009

First Reading: 3.16/8.8.1.4 SAC Appeal

More fun with the Constitution!

Dean's amendment: Wishes to eliminate 3.16, since it is identical to 8.8.1.4, except for the amount of directors required to hear the appeal. He supports having 2/3 vs 4/5. Doesn t think there should be a higher requirement on hearing the appeal than passing it.

Dick: proposes that the two parts of this amendment are voted on separately. Seconded by Amy.

Divided!

First up: eliminating 3.16.

vote: passes! 

Second: 2/3 or 4/5 of the BOA to hear SAC appeals.

no debate?!?

vote: passes. 2/3 it is!

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

oppertunistic much?

Anonymous said...

Does this have to go to second reading? The constitution isn't officially changed yet, is it?

Danielle O'Hanley said...

it needs to go to a second reading, so the constitution won't be changed unless it passes at the next meeting!