The entire lineup of defendants are giving statements, bringing up section 8.6.1.4 , stating that they were not given the chance to select the makeup of the SAC, that there have been irregularities in the handing-in of evidence after the deadline.

I find this convenient. Refuse to take part in the appeal, don't face your mistakes?


8.6.1.4
All parties involved in the dispute shall choose one of the following options in selecting the Arbitration Committee:
i) each party shall select one arbitrator to be a member of the Arbitration committee. The chosen arbitrators will then appoint a third arbitrator to the committee. Should the number of arbitrators appointed to the committee be of an even number, the Arbitration Committee shall appoint an extra arbitrator.
ii) The Chief Arbitrator and Arbitration Committee will select the appropriate uneven number of arbitrators for