Friday, March 6, 2009

SAC ruling on the walkout:

Carrying on with the arbitration process.

Can be appealed to the BOA if the defendants to choose.

Allegations of fraud: ridiculous and false.

It is true that the parties have the power to influence the panel - only have 4 arbitrators and need 3 for this committee. One was disqualified by conflict of interest, so there is no flexibility on the population of the committee.

There WAS a missed deadline, but all proof should be admissible unless there is good reason not to (cited canadian law). The new evidence does have value, and needs to be included.

Need to evaluate credibility of fraud allegations re: Ted's testimony.

** the crowd could be described as 'unruly'

No comments: